Search Results for "muddemal"

918 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 918 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Inconsistent and Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Anil Laxman Hichami, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for the murder of the deceased under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case arises from two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Marriage Dispute — Brother-in-Law Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Stabbing Deceased. Evidence of Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Nilesh @ Nitin Kanhere, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur, for the murder of Deepak Charpe, his brother-in-law, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Manish Gharat, an autorickshaw driver, who was allegedly killed by the appellants due to a love affair between the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Last Seen Evidence Unreliable and Extra-Judicial Confession Not Voluntary.

The appellant, Nitesh Pundlikrao Kathe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Homicidal Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Rule Out Accidental Fall and Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The appellant, Mahendra s/o Parashram Chakate, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Gondia, for the murder of his wife Maheshwari under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Temple Election Dispute — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Accused No.1 Under Section 302 IPC. Motive and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Despite Acquittal of Co-accused.

The appellant, Uttam Vaiju Majukar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for the murder of Suresh Annappa Bhogan under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused of Murder, Convicts Under Section 304 Part I IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. Single Blow on Cheek with Sickle Held Not Sufficient to Prove Intent to Kill, Reducing Offence from Section 302 to Section 304 Part I IPC.

The appellant, Murlidhar @ Murlya Gangaram Pawara, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his f...