Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Inconsistent and Lacked Corroboration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 113
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Anil Laxman Hichami, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for the murder of the deceased under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 1000. The conviction was based primarily on two written dying declarations and one oral dying declaration made to the deceased's wife, Banibai (P.W.3). The appellant challenged the conviction in the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inherent flaws in the dying declarations. The High Court, after re-appreciating the evidence, found that the dying declarations were inconsistent and unreliable. The court noted that the written dying declarations contained contradictions and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. The oral dying declaration to Banibai was also not supported by other evidence. Consequently, the High Court held that the prosecution had not met the standard of proof required for a criminal conviction. The appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment and order of conviction were set aside, and the appellant was acquitted of all charges.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Reliability - Conviction under Section 302 IPC based on two written dying declarations and one oral dying declaration - The court found inherent flaws in the dying declarations, including inconsistencies and lack of corroboration - Held that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Appeal allowed, conviction set aside (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declarations (two written and one oral) are reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment and order of conviction dated 30.09.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in S.C. No. 06 of 2012 is set aside. Appellant is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Fine, if paid, be refunded to the appellant.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration must be consistent and reliable
  • Inherent flaws in dying declaration cannot be basis for conviction
  • Oral dying declaration must be corroborated
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 160

Criminal Appeal No. 557 of 2014

2016-03-02

B.P. Dharmadhikari, V.M. Deshpande

Mir Nagman Ali for appellant, V.A. Thakare for respondent/State

Anil Laxman Hichami

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in S.C. No. 06 of 2012 dated 30.09.2013

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction Whether the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel argued that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inherent flaws in dying declarations State argued that dying declarations were consistent and reliable, and conviction should be upheld

Ratio Decidendi

Dying declarations with inherent flaws and inconsistencies cannot be the sole basis for conviction; prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in S.C. No. 06 of 2012 dated 30.09.2013, by which he is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. He submits that though there are two written dying declarations and one oral dying declaration made to Banibai (P.W.3), none of these dying declarations are helpful to the prosecution for securing conviction of the appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, on 30.09.2013 in S.C. No. 06 of 2012 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 02.03.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Inconsistent and Lacked Corroboration.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of No Fault Liability Set Aside. Insurer of the vehicle in which deceased was a cleaner held not liable for interim compensation under Section 140 of Motor Vehicle...