Search Results for "interlocutory"

1980 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1980 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of 381 Days' Delay in Filing Appeal Against Divorce Decree — Wife's Ignorance of Ex-Parte Decree Constitutes Sufficient Cause. Delay condoned as wife was unaware of the decree and learned of it only during DV Act proceedings, and no prejudice caused to husband.

The present Civil Application was filed by the applicant-wife seeking condonation of 381 days' delay in filing the Family Court Appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Single Judge's Rejection of Stay Applications in Civil Suits, Holding Section 151 CPC Cannot Override Specific Provisions. Stay of 2013 and 2016 Specific Performance Suits Was Denied as Section 10 CPC Requires Prior Suit and to Prevent Abuse of Process.

The appeals arose from the rejection of applications filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking stay of two civil suits (C....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court Order Impleading Purchasers in Second Appeal. High Court Allowed Condonation of Delay and Impleadment Under Order I Rule 10 and Order XXII Rule 10 CPC Despite Lis Pendens.

The litigation originates from a property dispute between the widows of Girdhari Lal. The original plaintiff Bhagwan Dai filed a suit claiming exclusi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...