Search Results for "contract enforcement"

1674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Securitisation Application Matter. Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act Against Interim Orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Upheld.

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Suit — Limitation Period for Challenge to Auction Sale Under Article 137 of Limitation Act Is Three Years from Date of Sale Confirmation

The appellant, R Venkatapathy, filed a suit (O.S. No. 8639/2006) before the City Civil Court, Bangalore, challenging the auction sale of property cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Defendants’ Interim Applications for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Section 12-A Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Bar Under SARFAESI Act. Applications Filed by Financial Institution Defendants Against Real Estate Borrower Group.

The dispute arises from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiffs against three defendants, seeking specific performance of a Framework Agreement date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Petition Challenging Ombudsman Award in Favor of Widow in Housing Loan Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Conditions Not Material to Risk, Ombudsman's Award Upheld.

This case involves a widow, Gauri V. Raut (Respondent No. 2), whose husband, along with her father-in-law and brother-in-law, passed away within a spa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...