Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

3677 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3677 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Repugnancy Between Section 28A of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 and Section 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Petitioner Contends That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Probate Revocation.

14 Feb 2014

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the constitutional validity of S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

22 Jul 2010

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal Against Refusal to Amend Arbitration Petition — Amendment Sought to Challenge Arbitral Award as Nullity Rejected as Time-Barred and Without Merit. The Court held that an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable against an order refusing amendment of a petition, and the amendment was rightly rejected as it was sought after the limitation period had expired.

7 Apr 2017

The case involves a Commercial Appeal filed by Zee Sports Ltd. (now Zee Digital Convergance Ltd.) against Nimbus Media Pte. Ltd. under Section 37 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Combined Second Appeals in Property Dispute Involving Individual and Charity. Substantial Questions of Law Frame the Priority of Gift Deed Over Sale Deed and Effect of Pending Litigation.

23 Nov 2006

The judgment pertains to two second appeals preferred before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arising out of two civil suits ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Limitation for Execution of Decree Not a Bar to Fresh Suit for Possession Based on Title. The court held that the right to recover possession based on title is not extinguished merely because a previous decree for possession has become time-barred for execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Mar 2014

This second appeal arises from a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs). The responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Possession and Limitation. The court held that the lower appellate court's findings on possession were perverse and not based on evidence, requiring a fresh adjudication on limitation and adverse possession under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three second appeals arising from a suit for possession filed by Salvador Quadros (respondent/plaintiff) against Conceicao Quadros a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Arrest of Vessel in Cargo Damage Claim — Maritime Lien Not Established. Bill of Lading Claim Does Not Give Rise to Maritime Lien; Owner Not Liable Due to Demise Clause.

11 Mar 2011

The case involves three appeals filed against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Admiralty Suit No.27 of 1999. The suit wa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenants' Appeals in West Bengal Eviction Case — Limitation Act Not Applicable to Section 7(2) Application Under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The Court held that the time limits under Section 7(2) are mandatory and only one extension of up to two months is permissible, and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply.

13 Aug 2019

The appeals arose from eviction petitions filed by the respondent-landlord against the appellants-tenants under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

8 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Defendant Company in Trust and Escheat Case — Shareholders of Dissolved Company Held Not Entitled to Sue for Recovery of Its Assets. The Court Ruled That After Dissolution Under Section 209H of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, Company Properties Vested in Government by Escheat and the Suit Was Also Barred by Limitation Under Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

20 Dec 1968

The dispute arose from the sale of plantation estates owned by a family-run limited company, Ouchterlony Valley Estates Limited (old company), to its ...

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)