Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Preliminary Objection in Election Petition No. 11 of 2009 Alleging EVM Tampering and Excess Expenditure. The Court Hears Arguments on Maintainability Under Sections 81(3) and 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The judgment pertains to an election petition filed by Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar, an independent candidate, challenging the election of Ashok Shankarrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses. Execution of Agreement Not Duly Proved Under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, as Attesting Witnesses Were Not Examined.

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.06.2005 filed by the respondent-plaintiff (Ashish Jain) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiffs' Regular Second Appeal Challenging Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Inam Land. Regrant of Land Under Karnataka Village Office Abolition Act During Pendency of Suit Does Not Prove Antecedent Ownership or Possession.

The case involves a regular second appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Dismissal of Declaration Suit. Suit Filed by Brother of Deceased Religious Head for Declaration of Ownership of Property Allotted in 1952, Dismissed by Trial Court.

This Regular First Appeal and cross-objections arise from the judgment and decree dated 9 September 2005 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Revision Application by Bank in SARFAESI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Civil Court Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Allegations of Fraud Must Be Specific and Supported by Material to Bypass Statutory Remedy Before Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Punjab National Bank (original defendant) against an order of the District Judge, Chandrapur, ...