Search Results for "written statement delay"

3584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Orders Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Sanction and Non-Application of Mind. Reassessment proceedings initiated without proper approval under Section 151(2) and based on borrowed satisfaction are invalid.

The petitioner, Ashok Commercial Enterprises, filed nine writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 19th July 2021 and 14th July 2021 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Setting Aside of Compromise Decree in Partition Suit Due to Fraud and Forged Signatures. Compromise Decree Based on Forged Signatures of Defendant No.5 is a Nullity and Can Be Challenged Beyond Limitation Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

The case arises from a partition suit filed by Dinbandhu Ojha (original plaintiff) seeking 1/4th share in the property of common ancestor Thakur Ojha....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute Over Will — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC cannot be used to re-argue the case or correct erroneous findings unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants (original appellants) filed a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seek...