Search Results for "legal malafide"

1119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Transport Appellate Tribunal Order in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Own Orders. The Tribunal cannot review its own orders under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as no power of review is conferred by the Act or Rules.

The petitioners, who are private bus operators, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal for Land Compensation Due to Inordinate Delay of 150 Years. Land Acquisition Dispute Rejected on Grounds of Delay and Laches as Appellants Failed to Explain Delay in Approaching Court.

The appellants, Sri Ramarao alias Ajit and Sri Sujit, filed a writ appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dismissing their writ petition o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of LIC Employee Challenging Transfer Order. Transfer is an incident of service and courts should not interfere unless mala fides or violation of statutory rules is established.

The appellant, Ramesh, was working as an Assistant Administrative Officer in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) at Raichur. He was transfer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Damages Award in Illegal Termination Suit; Cross-Objection for Higher Damages Also Considered. Judgment Under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 1 is Delivered After Remand for Quantification.

This case involved the challenge to the termination of a managerial employee in a private limited company. H.R. Thimmappa Gowda joined Goetze (India) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Sole Executrix in Probate Petition Under Indian Succession Act Over Will's Validity. Failure to Prove Execution Under Section 68 of Evidence Act and Suspicious Circumstances Found Including Testator's Ill Health and Exclusion of Sons.

The litigation originated from an application for probate of an alleged will executed by Edakuda Panankandiyil Narayana Kurup, who passed away on 4 Se...