CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "eviction grounds"
1054 result(s) found
Found 1054 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitions Seeking Re-evaluation of Judicial Service Examination Answer Sheets. No Right to Re-evaluation Exists in Absence of Specific Rules or Patent Error.
1 Mar 2024The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by practicing advocates who appeared for the Goa Judicial Service Examination (Civil Judge, Junior Divi...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.
6 Apr 2026The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...
- 179
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Arbitration Award Not Binding on Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that an arbitration award does not operate as res judicata against a party who was not a party to the arbitration and who purchased the property in a court auction.
29 May 2026The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits in respect of a three-storey commercial-cum-residential building situated at...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Overlapping Schemes and Conduct Fresh Survey of Eligible Slum Dwellers.
9 Jul 2015The case involves a group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over a slum rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtr...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal, Sets Aside Appellate Decree, and Remands Suit for Fresh Trial Due to Erroneous Rejection of Adjournment and Unexplained Delay in Pronouncing Judgment. Denial of Opportunity to Lead Evidence and Non-Compliance with Section 105 CPC Requirements on Challenging Interlocutory Orders Vitiate the Appellate Judgment.
20 Mar 2014Second Appeals Nos. 340 and 356 of 1999 arose from the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Akola, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 132 of 1988, whic...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Summary Nature of Disqualification Enquiry Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act; Rejects Member's Claim for Cross-Examination of Talathi. The Court held that a member facing disqualification for encroachment is only entitled to a reasonable opportunity of hearing and cannot convert the summary enquiry into an adversarial one by seeking oral evidence and cross-examination.
14 Oct 2021The present writ petition arose from a disqualification proceeding initiated before the Additional Collector, Nagpur, under Section 16 of the Maharash...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Over Cooperative Credit Societies. Members of Managing Committees Cannot Claim Immunity from Consumer Forum Orders as Cooperative Credit Societies Provide Services for Remuneration.
3 May 2011This group of writ petitions was filed by members of managing committees of cooperative credit societies challenging the jurisdiction of the District ...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Election Petition Order for Recount of Votes in Panchayat Samiti Election. Court upholds Election Judge's order for recount based on prima facie evidence of irregularities under Section 27 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.
20 Apr 2005The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising out of Election Petition No. 2 of 2002 filed under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and ...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.
5 Mar 2020The appellant, Harish, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 05.12.2008 allegedly executed by the respondents in his fav...
- 260
