Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

810 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 810 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Arbitrator in WAPCOS Ltd. v. Salma Dam Joint Venture. The court held that the arbitration agreement was novated by a subsequent amendment and that the petitioner lacked authority to invoke arbitration after revocation of power of attorney.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against the Delhi High Court's order appointing a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Oct 2019

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Compliance with DCR 2018 — Held that Construction Approved Prior to DCR 2018 is Not Subject to New FSI Restrictions. Vested rights of the petitioners were upheld as the building was substantially completed before the new regulations came into force.

26 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Sai Chintan C.H.S.LTD. and MPR Builders and Developers LLP, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 20.12.2022 is...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Interim Payment of Fees and Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Architectural Services. Court holds that Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be used to enforce payment of disputed fees without a final adjudication, and that an injunction against termination or redevelopment would be inequitable.

8 Dec 2022

The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner engaged in architectural services, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2021

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Partially Rejecting Amendment in Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act — Amendment Sought After Limitation Period Not Allowed as It Would Introduce New Grounds Beyond Scope of Section 34.

3 Jul 2021

The Appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Debit Balance and Share Valuation. The Court held that the arbitrator's award was not perverse or contrary to law, and that the scope of interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is limited.

14 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Mahesh Daulatram Changrani, was a constituent/client of the respondent, Religare Securities Ltd., a trading member of the National Sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Drilling Contract Dispute, Dismisses DDL's Cross-Challenge on Interest. Court upholds award of US$ 2,699,235.63 for wellhead tools and services but denies pre-award interest under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 May 2012

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Time Bar Clause. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that the petitioner failed to raise dispute within 30 days was based on evidence and not perverse, and demurrage was not conditional on indemnity.

30 Jun 2005

The case arises from a contract between Larsen & Toubro Limited (petitioner) and Sunfield Resources Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) for the supply of steaming ...

73 74 75 76 77

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)