Search Results for "Special Government Pleader"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Special Government Pleader"

2338 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2338 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Solatium and Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Referral Court Failed to Grant Mandatory Benefits Under Sections 23(1-A), 23(2) and 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Claimants Entitled to 30% Solatium, 12% Additional Compensation from Notification to Award, and Interest on Enhanced Compensation.

14 Oct 2022

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the original claimants in a land acquisition matter, against the judgment of the Referral Cou...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Alternative Free House Site on Kalam Poramboke Land. Land Classified as Water Catchment Area Cannot Be Assigned for Residential Purpose.

2 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Kalimuthu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Reference Cases, Holding References Within Limitation and Entitled to Enhanced Compensation Based on Prior Sale Transaction. The court set aside the Reference Court's dismissal of references as time-barred and awarded compensation at Rs. 82,500 per hectare with statutory benefits under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

27 Jan 2017

The judgment concerns two first appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging a common order of the Reference Court dated 10...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Specific Performance Suit — Unexplained Delay of Over 8 Years Not Condonable. Cross-Objection Filed After 3015 Days Without Sufficient Cause Rejected Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

19 Dec 2018

The judgment pertains to an application for condonation of delay of 3015 and 3166 days in filing cross-objection in Second Appeals No. 658/2007 and 70...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.1430 OF 2011

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Service of Writ of Summons Without Copy of Plaint Invalid in Commercial Suits Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Time for Filing Written Statement Does Not Run Until Proper Service Effected.

4 Aug 2021

The judgment addresses an interim application by the defendant, Metso India Pvt Ltd, in a commercial suit filed by Atlanta Limited. The core issue was...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Meeting Notice for Gram Panchayat President's Removal Due to Inclusion of Allegedly Disqualified Members. The court held that the meeting notice was vitiated as three members who were alleged to be disqualified under Section 3(3) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 were included as signatories, and their disqualification was pending adjudication.

26 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Sri G.R. Kumar, the President of Vishwanathana Halli Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

KAHC010525052012_1

23 Aug 2021

The litigation originated from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the plaintiff, D. Sujatha, against the legal representatives of the origi...

High Court

Writ petitions filed by various individuals claiming freedom fighter status against the District Collector, Beed, the Freedom Fighters' High Power Committee, the One Man Commission, and the State of Maharashtra.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

10 Jun 2010

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

73 74 75 76 77

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)