INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.626 OF 2010
12 Aug 2010The assessee, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2002-03 declaring a loss of Rs. 45.90 crores and claimed a...
Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"
799 result(s) found
Found 799 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Refers Question on Working Journalist Maintainability Under MRTU & PULP Act to Division Bench. Conflict of Single Judge Decisions on Whether Working Journalist is 'Employee' Under Section 3(5) MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Led to Reference.
29 Feb 2024The matter arose from writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders of the Industrial Court and Labour Court in comp...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows HUDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Section 5A Compliance Upheld. Collector's recommendation not binding on State Government; no discrimination found in acquisition of land for development.
18 Oct 2024The case involves appeals by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the High Court's judgment quashing land acquisition notifications unde...
- 832
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.
7 Feb 2025The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...
- 526
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Appointees in Drug Inspector Selection Case, Reversing High Court's Quashing of Appointments. The Court found no arbitrariness or illegality in the recast eligibility criteria, selection committee composition, or viva-voce marks allocation under the Jammu and Kashmir Subordinate Services Recruitment Rules, 1992, and reinstated the 2009 appointments.
28 Mar 2023The dispute arose from the selection process conducted on 8 September 2009 for appointing drug inspectors in Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the appoi...
- 249
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Non-Compliance with Secret Ballot Requirement. Election of Sarpanch set aside for violation of Rule 8(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964, which mandates secret ballot.
31 Jan 2023The petitioner, Vaishali Chaburao Katore, a member of Grampanchayat Nimgaon Khalu, challenged the election of respondent no.4, Shankar Ramdas Shinde, ...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Impleadment in Writ Petition Concerning Demolition of Building — Applicant Claims Ownership of Flat and Seeks to Protect Possession. The court held that the applicant has a direct interest in the property and should be heard before any order affecting his rights is passed.
13 Dec 2023The judgment pertains to an interim application filed by Nagesh Madhava Suvarna seeking impleadment in a pending writ petition. The writ petition was ...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside SDO's Possession Order Under Section 120(c) of MTAL Act — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Revision Beyond Limitation and Allowing Amendment Without Notice.
6 May 2022The petitioner, a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, owned agricultural land survey 209 admeasuring 35 acres at mouza Umarkhed...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDR Scheme Declaration — Petitioner Held Eligible Despite Summons Under CGST Act. Communication dated 2nd February 2020 rejecting declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 quashed as summons under Section 174 of CGST Act does not constitute 'investigation' under Section 121(e) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.
13 Jun 2022The petitioner, M/s. Anjali Services Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in providing outdoor catering ...
- 94
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Penalty Case — No Reasonable Cause for Penalty Under Section 271C When Assessee Acted on Professional Advice. Penalty under Section 271C of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be levied when assessee had reasonable cause for non-deduction of TDS based on professional advice that no income deemed to accrue in India.
3 Feb 2025The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Beng...
- 59
