Search Results for "long delay"

4612 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4612 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows UPPCL Appeal in Service Termination Case Due to Delay and Lack of Parity. Termination Order Was Speaking Order with Explicit Reason; Writ Petition Filed After 12 Years Dismissed for Laches.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Uttar Pradesh Power Corp. Ltd. (UPPCL) against the High Court's order reinstating Ram Gopal, a former Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Appeal in NIA Case on Ground of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellant, in custody since 2018, granted bail as co-accused similarly situated were released and trial had not commenced, upholding right to speedy trial under Article 21.

The appellant, Mohammad Raisuddin, was arrested in connection with NIA Special Case No. 3/2018 for alleged offences under the Unlawful Activities (Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Without Clear Averments of Their Role in the Offence.

The applicants, who are directors of M/s. Bunge India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...