Search Results for "court satisfaction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "court satisfaction"

5707 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5707 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Detention Order Under MPDA Act Illegal Due to Non-Application of Mind; Detaining Authority Failed to Provide Cogent Material for Likelihood of Bail While Detenu Was in Custody. The Court Ruled That Mere Possibility of Applying for Bail in Higher Court Without Real Imminence Does Not Satisfy Compelling Necessity Under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

4 May 2018

The petitioner, Ganesh Subhash Masurkar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 06.11.2017 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Lays Down Pan-India Guidelines Against Demolition of Properties of Accused Without Due Process. Executive Cannot Use Demolition as Punishment for Crime; Right to Shelter Protected Under Article 21.

1 Oct 2024

This batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raised a grievance that residential and commercial properties of persons ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge by Drug Supplier Against Blacklisting Order Alleging Non-Compliance with Rule 26A of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000. Petitioner Assails Blacklisting as Ultra Vires in Absence of Corrupt Practice Finding and Procedural Violation.

9 Jun 2026

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in FIR. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case under Sections 376, 354, 509, 504, 201, 34 IPC, and granted bail under Section 439 CrPC.

30 Apr 2010

The applicant, John Fernandes, was accused of rape and other offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The incident allegedly occurred on December 2, 2009...

High Court

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2020

3 Nov 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Writ Petition Against Lok Adalat Award Allegedly Procured by Fraud. The Court considered whether an award based on a compromise pursis can be challenged on the ground of fraud under Article 226 of the Constitution, despite the availability of an alternative civil remedy.

9 Jun 2025

The petitioner, Sushila Devidas Ghorpade, a 75-year-old widow and owner of agricultural land in Solapur, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an Awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor. The Court held that payment accepted under protest does not amount to accord and satisfaction, and an exclusion clause cannot bar claims for damages caused by the employer's own breach under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Sep 2017

The case arises from a construction contract between Vilayati Ram Mittal (P) Ltd. (the claimant/appellant) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI/responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Characterizing Order Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act as Administrative; Petition to be Heard by Division Bench. The Division Bench Rules That Externment Appeal Order Does Not Involve Quasi-Judicial Determination and Thus Falls Outside 'Order' Under Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

15 Sep 2016

The case arose from a Criminal Writ Petition filed by the petitioner challenging an externment order and the subsequent appellate order confirming the...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)