Search Results for "common law rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "common law rights"

5247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5247 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Title Dispute, Holds Res Judicata Not Applicable to Findings in Dismissed Suits. The State was not required to appeal findings in suits dismissed against it, and such findings do not bar the State from contesting the same issue in a related suit where a decree was passed against it.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a High Court order that dismissed the State's appeal in a land title dispute on grounds of res judicata. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Holds that BSA governed by Benin law with foreign seat cannot be brought under Part I of Arbitration Act, and issue estoppel applies due to dismissal of anti-arbitration injunction.

30 Nov -0001

The Supreme Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by Balaji Steel Trade under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Possession in Favor of Plaintiffs. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove her title and possession over the suit property, and the plaintiffs established their prior possession and entitlement to injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

9 Dec 2020

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the unsuccessful defendant No.2, C.N. Leelava...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's refusal to interfere with punishment of dismissal for collecting Rs.14/- but issuing Rs.5/- ticket and having cash excess of Rs.11/- is confirmed as not perverse.

8 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rohidas Premchand Bhagat, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1 Novemb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Partition Decree. Trial Court Had Decreed Suit for Partition and Separate Possession, and Appeals Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Challenge That Decree.

22 Dec 2022

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Denies Probation to Adult Offenders. Section 20AA of PoFA Act, which excludes application of Probation of Offenders Act and Section 360 CrPC for offenders above 18, is constitutional and does not violate Articles 14, 21, or 20(1) of the Constitution.

15 Jul 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed two criminal appeals arising from convictions under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PoFA Act). In the lead ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Arrest for Non-Furnishing of Written Grounds Under Article 22(1) and Section 47 BNSS. The Appeal Arises from High Court's Upholding of Arrest Despite Procedural Lapse, with the Supreme Court Considering the Mandatory Nature of the Requirement.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court considered multiple criminal appeals involving the common question of law regarding the mandatory nature of furnishing grounds of ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)