Search Results for "commercial execution petition"

1786 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1786 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Private Complaints for Dishonour of Cheque Over Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Section 142(2) of NI Act Does Not Mandate Police Investigation, Private Complaint Maintainable.

The case involved a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 142(2) of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Concerning 'REGAL' Footwear Mark. Registered Proprietor Seeks Injunction Against Identical Mark Used by Defendant for Footwear Retail, Raising Prior Use and Acquiescence Defences.

The dispute arose in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in a suit for trademark infringement and passing off concerning the mark 'REGAL'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Orders Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness, but defendants cannot forfeit earnest money without proof of loss.

The original plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.02.2008 in respect of a suit property admeasuring 70,000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Decision on Quashing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Dispute; Developers Contend Breach of Contract, Not Cheating. Court Examines Whether Civil Dispute Can Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Karnataka High Court heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of mult...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Tender Exclusion Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by State. Exclusion from tender for school uniform cloth procurement set aside as evaluation committee failed to consider petitioners' compliance with technical specifications.

The petitioners, Kanchan India Limited and Arvind Cotsyn India Limited, challenged their exclusion from a tender process issued by the Government of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...