Search Results for "Tenant Revision"

1048 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1048 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Conviction for Employing Child Labour in Tailor Shop. Conviction under Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 for employing two children below 14 years as helpers upheld.

The petitioner, Sri A M Samiulla, owned a tailor shop named 'Gents Select Tailors' in Gandhinagar, Bangalore. On 27 January 2006, the Senior Labour In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act Set Aside as Suit Land Not Trust Property on 1.4.1957.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 10.8.1998 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Revenue Minister's Order Setting Aside Restoration of Land to Tenant. Delay of 34 Years in Filing Appeal Not Sufficiently Explained, Condonation Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Debashish Devnarayan Ghosh, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revenue Minister of Maharashtra and the Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Agreement for use of shop premises held to be a lease, not a licence, based on exclusive possession and intention of parties.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...