Search Results for "Separate legal entity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Separate legal entity"

1012 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1012 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down LIC Circular Imposing Assignment Charge on Finance Organizations as Ultra Vires Section 38 of Insurance Act, 1938. The court held that LIC cannot impose a charge on assignments of life insurance policies in favor of finance companies as it amounts to a restriction on the statutory right of assignment under Section 38.

19 May 2010

The petitioners, Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. (a Non-Banking Finance Company) and its director Hasmukh Rawal, challenged a Circular dated 24.4.2006 issued...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Commercial Appeals Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Suit Over Film Song; Directs Strict Compliance of Registration Procedures by Original Side Registry

28 Aug 2017

The appeal arose from an ad-interim injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff in a copyright infringement suit concerning the song 'Kah Doon Tumhe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Demolition of Shop without Notice Illegal under Section 23 of Karnataka State Highways Act, 1964. Tenant's Possession Protected When Authorities Demolish Building Without Following Procedural Mandate.

4 Jul 2024

The petitioner was a tenant running a textile shop in a building at Magadi Town, measuring 19 feet by 76 feet, referred to as Schedule-B property. He ...

High Court

Writ Petition No. 2353 of 2013: Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Notices Issued Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Amidst Ownership Dispute

14 Jul 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple Second Appeals in Dispute Between Acharyas and Plaintiffs Over Mahanubhav Ashram – Suit Involves Questions of Religious Practice and Trust Management

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Cooperative Federation on Pay Scale Revision Date Due to Financial Constraints. The Court Held That Financial Stringency Is a Valid Consideration for Deferring Implementation of Revised Pay Scales Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Service Rules, Overturning the High Court's Finding of Unfairness.

9 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Punjab State Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. against a High Court order that a...

High Court

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019

11 Dec 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

13 Jan 2014

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)