Search Results for "Effective Communication"

1653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Regarding Liability for Defects in Gas Turbine Generators. Award Deals with Claims for Damages Due to Breakdown and Repair Costs Under a Turnkey Contract.

The dispute arises from a contract between Thermax Limited (Petitioner) and Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (Respondent) for the turnkey instal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Consideration of Vital Documents. Detaining Authority's Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated Due to Failure to Place Exhibits Before It.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Rashid Ahmed Siddique, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order for FY 2013-14 Against Luxembourg-Based Companies Due to Gross Violation of Natural Justice and Backdating of Order. Assessment order found to be pre-dated and based on no notice or hearing, rendering it null and void.

The petitioners, comprising two Luxembourg-based companies (Petitioners 1 and 2) and their Indian group company (Petitioner 3), challenged an assessme...