WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014
30 Oct 2015Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...
Search Results for "Consequential Circular"
743 result(s) found
Found 743 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.
30 Oct 2015The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.
4 Jun 2015The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.
9 May 2014This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Notification Restricting Construction Near Protected Monuments. Court Holds Rules Framed under Section 38 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 Are Intra Vires, but Does Not Decide Validity of Notification in Available Text.
5 Jul 2006The High Court of Bombay heard four writ petitions together concerning the validity of a notification dated 16.6.1992 issued under the Ancient Monumen...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging RBI and Central Government Actions Under Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Interim Stay Granted Against Amalgamation. Court Finds Prima Facie Haste and Lack of Propriety in Decision-Making Process Leading to Status Quo Ante Restoration.
5 Apr 2006The matter involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions taken by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Central Gover...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions Challenging MHADA's Cancellation of Police Housing Lease — Allotment Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme at Gaikwad Nagar Questioned
6 May 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two connected writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the M...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Transfer Order of Deputy Collector for Violating Mandatory Mid-Tenure Transfer Procedure under Section 4(5) of Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfer Act. Transfer held illegal as competent authority did not initiate proposal, record reasons, or obtain clear prior approval.
4 Feb 2019The petitioner, a Deputy Collector in the Maharashtra Government service, was transferred mid-tenure from the post of Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhiwandi...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against Fresh Voter List Cut-off Date in Cooperative Elections. The Court upheld the validity of a new cut-off date prescribed by the State Cooperative Election Authority under Sections 27(3A) and 73CB of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, holding that since the final voters list had not been declared, the authority could initiate a fresh cut-off date.
30 Jan 2024Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Scheme. Petitioners, Tenement Owners, Opposed Redevelopment by Developer Appointed by Majority of Society Members and Sought Quashing of Eviction Order and Declaration that Scheme Is Illegal.
24 Apr 2012The petitioners, eight members and owners of tenements in Chitranjan Nagar Vidya Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (East), Mumb...
- 20
