Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1102 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Enforcement of Interim Arbitral Award Pending Section 34 Challenge. Court holds that once a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is filed within time, the arbitral award does not become enforceable until the expiry of the limitation period or disposal of the petition, and interim relief can be granted to preserve the subject matter.

18 Oct 2012

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the petitioners in an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Petition — Delay Beyond 30 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the proviso to Section 34(3) allows extension of only 30 days beyond the three-month period, and an application under Section 33 does not extend limitation.

30 Mar 2016

The applicants, Blue Prime Aluminum Ltd. and others, filed a notice of motion seeking condonation of 24 days delay in filing an arbitration petition u...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Interest Dispute — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable from Date of Possession, Not Notification Under Section 4(1). The court clarified that Section 28 explicitly provides for interest from the date of possession, and the executing court's contrary view was erroneous.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioners, M.V. Subba Rao and M.M.G. Prasad, were owners of land in Singapore Village, Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District, which was acquired fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2024

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute. The court held that the District Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and substituting its own view, which is not permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Oct 2012

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the appellants (partners of a firm) against the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit Against Principal Borrower Despite Moratorium Against Guarantors Under IBC. The court permitted the plaintiff to proceed only against defendant no.1 (principal borrower) while reserving rights against guarantors under moratorium.

6 Apr 2026

The plaintiff, IL & FS Financial Services Limited, filed a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recover ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Sep 2015

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Restraint Order Set Aside as Arbitrator Already Appointed and No Urgent Relief Required. The court held that a Section 9 petition is not maintainable after the appointment of an arbitrator, as the arbitrator can grant interim measures under Section 17 of the Act.

22 Jun 2006

The appellant, Prakash Boolu Kundar, filed an Appeal from Order against the judgment and order dated November 18, 2005 passed by the Joint District Ju...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)