Search Results for "preliminary decision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "preliminary decision"

4845 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4845 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2019

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Police Recruitment Selection Process — No Merit in Allegations of Irregularities in Physical Endurance Test and Document Verification. Court Held That Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Any Arbitrariness or Violation of Rules in the Selection Process Conducted by Maharashtra Public Service Commission.

22 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Santosh Pandurang Lokhande, filed a writ petition challenging the selection process for the post of Police Sub-Inspector conducted by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

29 Apr 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

23 Feb 2015

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act for Non-Compliance of Earlier Judgment. Failure to Implement Labour Court Order Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Schedule IV Item 9 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Indian Coffee Workers Coop. Society Ltd., challenged the maintainability of Complaint U.L.P. No.106/2015 filed by respondent employees...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Arbitrator's Orders Refusing to Decide Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue. Arbitrator Must Rule on Jurisdiction at Threshold Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

30 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Northroof Ventures Private Limited (formerly M/s. Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companie...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

17 Aug 2017

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Remand Ordered Due to Non-Joinder of Necessary Party and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. The lower appellate court's order setting aside the trial court's decree and remanding the matter for fresh disposal was upheld as the trial court had failed to implead all necessary co-sharers and had not properly appreciated the evidence.

29 Jul 2016

The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of his share in the plaint 'B' and 'C' schedule properties. The trial cour...

71 72 73 74 75

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)