Search Results for "long term agreement"

1978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Housing Board Against High Court Order Directing Arbitration Tribunal to Entertain Fresh Claim Despite Prior Arbitral Award. Principle of Issue Estoppel and Finality of Award Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Applied.

The case involves three civil appeals by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a common judgment of the Madhya Prade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenges to State Guidelines on Appointment of Pollution Control Board Chairman. Court Considers Whether Executive Guidelines Violate Water Act and Binding Supreme Court Precedent.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of eight writ petitions, six of which were filed in public interest litigation jurisdiction. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Inquiry Report Under Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioners Challenge Orders Holding Former Employees and Directors Liable for Financial Loss Due to Non-Recovery of Rickshaw and Housing Loans.

This group of 19 writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court challenging an inquiry report/order dated 25.09.2018 passed under Section 88 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ineligibility for IOCL Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Lack of Land Ownership. Petitioner placed in Group-3 as she failed to provide proof of ownership of land, and her claim of ownership based on unregistered agreement was not accepted.

The petitioner, Smt. Sharda W/o Arun Morghare, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a communicati...