Search Results for "legal bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "legal bar"

6760 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6760 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against KERC Order on Solar Power Tariff. The Dispute Centers on Whether Commissioning Certificate or Actual Injection of Power Determines Commercial Operation Date Under the Power Purchase Agreement.

22 May 2023

The petitioner, a solar power developer, challenged an order of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that denied a higher tariff by ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

High Court

High Court Rejects Remand Request in Land Acquisition Enhancement Appeal — Acquiring Body's Failure to File Written Statement After Being Allowed to Participate Does Not Warrant Remand. The Court Relied on the Principle That Mere Technicalities Cannot Defeat the Ends of Justice When the Party Had Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.

2 Feb 2016

The first appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by the acquiring body, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Suit, Holding Section 134(2) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Confers Additional Forum. Plaintiff Allowed to Sue Where It Carries on Business Even If Cause of Action Arose Elsewhere.

8 Aug 2011

The case arose out of a suit for perpetual injunction filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited (plaintiff) against Ashique Chemicals and others (defendants...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Dismissal of Appeal as Barred by Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC — Termination of Headmaster Upheld Due to Withdrawal of Earlier Appeals Without Liberty to File Fresh Appeal. The court held that the third appeal on the same cause of action was barred under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, despite the termination being illegal under the MEPS Act.

12 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a headmaster appointed on 19th June 1991, was terminated by an order dated 6th October 2001. He initially filed Appeal No. 99 of 2001 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals with Safeguards for Digital Divide. The amendment to the Electronic Filing Rules under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 was held valid due to gradual implementation and stakeholder training, but the court directed measures like e-sewa kendras and grievance redressal to address access issues.

29 Mar 2023

The proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution were instituted to challenge the amendment to Rule 3 of the Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) and De...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Waqf Board Supersession Case — Upholds Government's Power to Supersede Board Under Section 99 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Elected Members Are Less Than Nominated Members, Rendering Board Unable to Perform Functions. Partial Setting Aside of Supersession Order Is Impermissible; Challenge Barred by Constructive Res Judicata.

9 Sep 2020

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against a common judgment of the Madras High Court that partially set aside the supersession of the Tamil Nadu Waqf B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Improvement Compensation Case — Constructive Res Judicata Not Applicable Due to Liberty Reserved by Earlier Order. The Court held that the claim for compensation under the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 is not barred by constructive res judicata because the Supreme Court had expressly kept open the remedy in the earlier proceedings.

5 Feb 2019

The dispute concerns a large tract of land originally belonging to Vengunadu Kovilakam, leased out in 1897 for 75 years. After the lease expired in 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Inquiry Report of Goa Human Rights Commission Against Police Inspector for Alleged Assault and Illegal Detention — Report Found to Violate Principles of Natural Justice and Be Based on No Evidence.

12 May 2023

The petitioner, a Police Inspector, challenged an inquiry report dated 24.09.2015 of the Goa Human Rights Commission which found him guilty of violati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that the trial court failed to consider the provisions of Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the explanation of the defendants regarding non-appearance.

16 Mar 2021

The petitioners, original defendants in a suit for specific performance of contract, challenged the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Washi, ...

71 72 73 74 75

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)