Search Results for "land title dispute"

3585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Relief in Housing Society's Suit for Conveyance and Challenging Construction Approvals. The Court Was Hearing a Notice of Motion and an Appeal from Order Regarding Alleged Unauthorized Construction and Failure to Execute Conveyance Under MOFA.

The judgment text provided is truncated and does not include the court's analysis or final decision. From the available text, the High Court was heari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal, Holds Section 84 Not an Alternative to Section 29(1) in Bombay Tenancy Act. Court Rules Invalid Surrender Does Not Entitle Tenant to Summary Eviction Under Section 84, Remedy Lies with Mamlatdar Under Section 29(1).

The dispute arose under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent 1, the landowner, owned two survey numbers in Panchmahals, Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Decrees Declaring Lapse of Land Reservation. Issues of Lapsing Under Section 127 of MRTP Act and Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 149 Argued.

This second appeal arose from concurrent judgments and decrees of lower courts declaring that the reservation on the suit property, owned by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Refusal to Certify Mutation Entry in Favour of Legal Heirs. Revenue Authorities Cannot Refuse Certification Based on Title Dispute; Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title.

The petitioners, Dadbhai Amrubhai Varu and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Appeals Challenging Apportionment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Awarded Entire Compensation to One Party Without Framing Issues or Properly Evaluating Evidence Under Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard three first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court dated 15.07.2010, which had awarded the entire c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Ceiling Act Case — Purchasers from Surplus Land Owner Not Entitled to Review as No Error Apparent on Record. The court held that purchasers cannot claim better rights than their vendor and that review is not an appeal in disguise.

The judgment concerns two review applications (Miscellaneous Civil Application No.81/1999 and No.86/1999) filed by purchasers of agricultural land fro...