Search Results for "implied bar"

903 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 903 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Juvenile Cannot File Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC; Remedy Lies Under Juvenile Justice Act. The JJ Act is a complete code providing for bail provisions for children in conflict with law, and Section 438 CrPC is not available to them.

The case involved a reference to a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to decide whether a juvenile in conflict with law can file an application f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Writ Petition Against Insurance Ombudsman Award in Life Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Ailments Not Proven to be Material Under Section 45 of Insurance Act, 1938.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an award dated 31 December 2020 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman, Goa/Mumbai Met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Complainant Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 34 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the complainant, Abdul Rasheed, against the acquittal of the accused persons in Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Witness Summons Against Senior Advocate in Professional Communication Privilege Case. Communication Between Advocate and Client Held Privileged Under Section 126 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Cannot Be Compelled to Be Produced.

The petitioner, a designated Senior Advocate of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.

The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld for Workmen Found to Have Completed 240 Days of Service and Terminated Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Duncan Engineering Ltd. (erstwhile Schrader Duncan Ltd.) challenging separate awards passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Property Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Allegations of Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Under Sections 406, 420 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Quashed as Dispute Pertains to Breach of Contract, Not Criminal Offence.

The petitioners, Eng. Sheldon S. Martins and Neesha Varela, filed Criminal Writ Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and ...