Search Results for "amended plaint"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "amended plaint"

1389 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1389 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Adoption Deed Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 11 of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Actual Giving and Taking of Child Not Proved, Rendering Adoption Invalid.

10 Feb 2014

The appellant, Smt. Parvathamma, filed a suit in O.S.No.277/1989 before the Principal Munsiff and JMFC, Tumkur, seeking a declaration that the first r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings Due to Non-Joinder of Necessary Party and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. The court held that the suit for partition and separate possession was not maintainable without impleading the legal representatives of a deceased co-sharer, and that the appellate court failed to properly re-appreciate the evidence as required under Section 100 CPC.

4 Feb 2013

The appellant, Mohd. Munner, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree...

High Court

SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016

21 Dec 2016

The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Application by Returned Candidate to Reject Election Petition for Alleged Non-Compliance with Representation of the People Act, 1951 Pleading Requirements. Application Alleges Failure to Plead Material Facts and Serve Exhibits Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and Sections 81, 83 of Representation of the People Act, 1951.

1 Aug 2025

The present matter arose from an application filed by the returned candidate in an election petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Alteration of Share Capital — Interim Relief Granted to Protect Plaintiff's Rights Pending Suit. The court held that the plaintiff, a director, had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim injunction against the company and other directors regarding the alteration of share capital from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in the Memorandum of Association.

1 Aug 2017

The case involves a dispute within a family-owned company, H. Fillunger & Company Pvt. Ltd., where the plaintiff, Ajit Arvind Marathe, a director, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Balance of Convenience Favors Plaintiff. Trial Court's Order Restraining Defendant from Creating Third Party Interest Upheld as Plaintiff Established Prima Facie Case and Irreparable Loss.

2 Aug 2023

The appellant, Smt. Manisha Kode, challenged an order dated 24.01.2023 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad in Special Civil Suit No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Respondents Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Court holds that the trial court's rejection of application to set aside ex-parte decree was erroneous as the respondents were not duly served and had a valid defence.

5 May 2014

The petitioner, M/s Cosme Mathias Menezes Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of money against M/s Naguesh Electronics, initially described as a prop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Application to Produce Additional Documents in Suit by NTPC — Belated Filing After Cross-Examination Concluded and Multiple Prior Opportunities Not Availed. The court held that the defendant's conduct indicated a desire to delay the trial and that permitting the documents would cause prejudice to the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1 and Order 13 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

29 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant, Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), in a suit pending since 2006 filed by the plaintiff, N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals in Partition Dispute. Appellants Challenge First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decrees Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

10 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Admiralty Suit for Recovery of Value of Goods Lost Due to Non-Issuance of Bill of Lading. Claim Against Vessel Owner and Agent for Breach of Duty Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act is Examined.

9 Aug 2005

This admiralty suit was filed by the plaintiff, Geetanjali Woollen Pvt. Ltd., seeking recovery of US$ 57,860 with interest for the loss of export good...

71 72 73 74 75

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)