Search Results for "Seized Money"

1716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Namdeo and Shivaji Dongre (appellants) for the murder of Balaji Dongre, who was the son of ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the offence of kidnapping for ransom under Section 364-A IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) for offences under Sections 363 and 364-A read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradict Each Other and Lack Corroboration.

The appellants, Ramesh, Suresh, and Malanbai, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Jayashri, the wife of appellant No.1, by pouring ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Wife Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together, motive, and recovery of dead body at accused's instance held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Akhtarali @ Manik Ashrafali Shaikh, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of his wife Payal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Motive and Circumstantial Evidence — Appellants Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Killing Deceased Due to Sister's Suicide Over Love Affair.

The appellants, Anil Kallappa Parshetty and Manoj Kallappa Parshetty, were convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for smashing head with stone set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kurashid Mohd. Umar Ghori, was convicted by the 8th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai on 21st June 2008 in Sessions Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case — Conviction for Stabbing Wife to Death on Suspicion of Infidelity Upheld. Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Reports Found Credible, No Ground for Interference.

The appellant, Sayyed Sultan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli, for the murder of his wife, Rizwanabee, under Section 302 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Father in Axe Murder of Son. Conviction under Section 302 IPC based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, rejecting defense of false implication.

The appellant, Bhimsha Gurusidha Chendke, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of his son, Shivputra, by the ...