Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case — Conviction for Stabbing Wife to Death on Suspicion of Infidelity Upheld. Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Reports Found Credible, No Ground for Interference.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sayyed Sultan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli, for the murder of his wife, Rizwanabee, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500. The marriage had taken place 17 years prior to the incident, and the couple had two sons. The prosecution case was that the appellant suspected his wife of speaking on the phone with other men, leading to frequent quarrels and beatings. Three months before the incident, the complainant (the deceased's father) had given Rs. 10,000 to the appellant for house construction. Eight days before the incident, the deceased had gone to her parents' house due to loose motion. On 9 August 2010, the appellant, along with his father and nephew, went to the complainant's house. While the deceased was cooking, the appellant allegedly stabbed her in the abdomen with a knife. The complainant and others tried to intervene but were held back by the co-accused. The deceased was rushed to the hospital but was declared dead. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC, while acquitting the co-accused under Section 498A IPC. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of eye-witnesses (PW1 complainant, PW2 Shehedabee, PW3 Sayyad Javed) and medical evidence (PW5 Dr. Shinde). The court found the witnesses credible and their testimony consistent. The medical evidence confirmed that the death was due to stab injuries. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on eye-witness testimony and medical evidence - The appellant was convicted for stabbing his wife to death on suspicion of infidelity. The court held that the testimony of eye-witnesses, including the complainant and other relatives, was consistent and corroborated by medical evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction was upheld. (Paras 1-12)

B) Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Section 498A Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Acquittal of co-accused - The trial court acquitted the co-accused under Section 498A, and the state did not appeal. The High Court did not interfere with the acquittal. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Case No.110 of 2010 are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Eye-Witness Testimony
  • Medical Evidence
  • Motive
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (04) 33

Criminal Appeal No.608 Of 2011

2014-04-02

K.U. Chandiwal, V.M. Deshpande

Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Mr. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa, Mr. P.N. Mule

Sayyed Sultan s/o Sayed Razzak

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment; co-accused acquitted under Section 498A IPC

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable on the basis of eye-witness testimony and medical evidence

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and witnesses were interested State argued that the testimony of eye-witnesses was consistent and corroborated by medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC can be sustained on the basis of credible eye-witness testimony and corroborative medical evidence, even in the absence of direct motive, when the witnesses are natural and their evidence is consistent.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants assail conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli... The appellant and acquitted accused persistently demanded money for construction of house. The appellant questioned and felt his wife allegedly was speaking on telephone with others. The appellant allegedly hit his wife with knife on abdomen... On examination, Medical Officer declared her dead.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Case No.110 of 2010 on 30 November 2011. He filed Criminal Appeal No.608 of 2011, which was admitted on 17 December 2011. The appeal was heard and decided on 2 April 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498A, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case — Conviction for Stabbing Wife to Death on Suspicion of Infidelity Upheld. Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Reports Found Credible, No Ground for Interference.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Tender in Construction Contract. Tender Condition Requiring Registration with 'Appropriate Authority' Interpreted Reasonably to Include State Government Registration.