Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1400 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1400 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Order in Murder Case for Non-Compliance with Section 306 CrPC — Pardon Granted Without Examining Accused as Witness Violates Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Mahesh Balasaheb Thakoor, original accused no.3 in a murder case, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 304-I IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death or common intention beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 643/2005 filed by the original accused Nos. 2 and 3 (Bhagtam and Mukesh) challenging their convicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Public View. Land Dispute and Caste-Based Allegations Fail to Sustain Conviction Under SC & ST Act

Criminal Law-- Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 363, 366, 506 and 376-- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO)- Section 4-- The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Narco Analysis Order Against Accused in Bank Fraud Case — Consent Not Voluntary and Violates Article 20(3). Narco analysis without free consent amounts to testimonial compulsion under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Mrs. Rajeshree Aman Hemani, was an accused in Criminal Case No.19 of 2005 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, arising out of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 447 read with 34 of IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vijay Jagannath Khairnar and Suresh Jagannath Khairnar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves multiple appeals against conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 400 of 2004. The appellan...