Search Results for "Revenue Code"

3626 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3626 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Tahsildar's Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code in Mineral Extraction Penalty Case. Writ petitions challenged penalty orders for illegal mineral extraction and raised interplay of Sections 48(7) and 330A regarding authorization and delegation of powers.

The judgment, delivered by the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), addressed three writ petitions filed by Montecarlo Ltd. Iron Triangle (Joint Vent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting Order in Sand Ghat Auction — Review Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Divisional Commissioner's Order Quashed as Petitioner Was Not Afforded Opportunity of Hearing Before Adverse Decision.

The petitioner, Raju Leeladhar Sawwalakhe, a businessman involved in sand excavation for about 20 years, participated in an auction of sand ghats cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sub-Divisional Officer's Revision Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. Sub-Divisional Officer Not Authorized to Exercise Revisional Powers Under Section 23(2) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bija Maroti Hatwar, filed an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, seeking to restrain respondent no.1 from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...