Search Results for "Family Courts Act, 1984"

1116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Judgment on Appeals Against Conviction in S.C.No.122/2015; Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Challenged by Accused.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused Nos. 1 to 3 against the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Bar Council Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction in Professional Misconduct Complaint — Complaint Filed by Judgment Debtor Against Decree Holder's Advocate Not Maintainable Under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961

The petitioner, Sri Paras Jain, an advocate practicing in Bengaluru for 44 years, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Death Sentence in Rape and Murder of Two Children. Conviction Under Sections 302, 376(2)(f),(g) and 201 IPC Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The review petitions were filed by Manoharan, the sole surviving accused, against the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 01.08.2019 which affirmed hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21.

The writ petition was filed by Mushtaq Moosa Tarani, accused No. 44 in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts trial (Bombay Blast Case No. 1 of 1993), under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction of Tenant for Subletting and Unauthorised Assignment. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 106 Notice Upheld as Valid.

The case involves a dispute over eviction of a tenant from premises in Mumbai. The original landlord, Mr. N.V. Baliga, owned a building at 257, Frere ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...