Search Results for "reference procedure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "reference procedure"

12224 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12224 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Suit Maintainability in Land Declaration Dispute After Finding Notice Under Section 80 CPC by Karta Sufficient for Divided Coparceners. Karta’s Notice Given While Family Joint Held to Enure for Benefit of All Coparceners Despite Subsequent Partition, as Substantial Identity Existed Between Notice-Giver and Plaintiffs under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

11 Mar 1969

The dispute arose from a declaratory suit filed by Beohar Rajendra Sinha and his three grandsons against the State of Madhya Pradesh seeking a declara...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals on Land Acquisition Compensation for Minor Irrigation Tank. Reference Court's Enhanced Market Value Challenged by Both State and Land Losers.

24 Apr 2020

The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning compensation for lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank in Kakhandaki Village. The dispute involves the correct determination of market value following the Reference Court's enhancement from the initial awards of the Land Acquisition Officer.

24 Apr 2020

These appeals under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.

6 Nov 2006

The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Reference Against Defendants for Willful Disobedience of Court Orders in Small Causes Suit. Failure to Furnish Particulars Despite Repeated Directions Constitutes Civil Contempt Under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

4 Apr 2006

This case involves a reference made by the Small Causes Judge, Mumbai, to the Bombay High Court under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Discretion of Parsi Matrimonial Courts to Appoint Court Commissioner for Evidence Recording Under PMDA. The court held that the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 does not expressly or impliedly bar the application of Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC for recording evidence before a Commissioner.

21 Nov 2024

The case arose from an appeal against an order dated 3 April 2014 passed by the learned Parsi Chief Metropolitan Court, Mumbai (Justice G S Patel) in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Respondent Held Invalid; Former High Court Judge Appointed as Sole Arbitrator.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Eagle – MPCC (J.V.), a joint venture company, entered into a contract with the respondent, South Western Railway, on 08/03/2011...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Activates Dormant Constitutional Provision for Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges to Address High Court Backlog. The Court held that Article 224A of the Constitution of India can be utilized to appoint retired High Court judges as ad hoc judges to tackle over 57 lakh pending cases and 40% vacancies, emphasizing dynamic interpretation and consent requirements.

20 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation filed by Lok Prahari, addressed the critical issue of backlog in High Courts, with over 57...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Mandamus to Register FIR in Economic Offences Case — No Mandatory Duty to Register FIR on Private Complaint Without Preliminary Inquiry. Court Holds That Police Have Discretion to Conduct Preliminary Inquiry Before Registering FIR Under Section 154 CrPC, and Writ of Mandamus Cannot Be Issued to Compel Registration.

26 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Charu Kishor Mehta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to c...

70 71 72 73 74

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)