Search Results for "joint committee"

2399 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2399 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds University Ordinance on MBBS Exam Revaluation — Regulation 5 of RGUHS Ordinance dated 01.02.2021 held valid and not violative of Article 14. The court found that the ordinance prescribing a uniform revaluation fee and procedure was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.

The petitioners, Vishweshwara C and Shashank S. Reddy, were first-year MBBS students at Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Vydehi Institute of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CAT Interim Order in Service Matter — Deputation Absorption Dispute. CAT lacked jurisdiction to restrain State Government from absorbing deputationists into Karnataka Administrative Service, and order passed without hearing affected parties violates natural justice.

The petitioners, eight officers of the Karnataka State Government, were on deputation to various departments and were sought to be absorbed into the K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears writ petition challenging blacklisting order of consultant by MCGM for alleged collusion in road works. Dispute concerns alleged denial of natural justice in blacklisting process under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a request for qualification issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 23 October 2013, inviting consultan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Civil Suit for Recovery Survives Approval of Resolution Plan Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petition raises the question of the overriding effect of the IBC on pending civil proceedings.

The matter arose from a summary suit filed by respondent No.1, a proprietary concern, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, but Alternative Relief of Damages Granted. Court holds that failure to prove agreement does not bar claim for earnest money refund under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, an architect, filed three suits for specific performance of agreements to sell immovable property against Gustavo Pinto and Lucio Miran...