Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Order Restoring Posting of Joint Director-Boilers, Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Director. Transfer order set aside for non-application of mind and violation of transfer policy; adverse observations against Director expunged as he was not heard before being indicted.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two writ petitions arising from a common judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 29 March 2019. The first petition (WP-6957-2019) was filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the Tribunal's order setting aside the transfer of Sanjay Dinkarrao Mankar from Nagpur to Solapur. The second petition (WP-5599-2019) was filed by Dhawal P. Antapurkar, Director, Steam Boilers, seeking expungement of adverse remarks made against him by the Tribunal. The facts are that Sanjay Mankar was promoted to the post of Joint Director-Boilers and posted at Nagpur by order dated 29 September 2018. However, by order dated 20 November 2018, his posting was changed to Solapur without any justification. Mankar challenged this before the Tribunal, which allowed his application, setting aside the transfer order and restoring his posting at Nagpur. The Tribunal also made adverse observations against Antapurkar, impleaded in personal capacity, alleging malafides. The High Court, after hearing both sides, upheld the Tribunal's decision on the transfer, finding that the order was passed without application of mind and in violation of the transfer policy. However, the High Court held that the adverse remarks against Antapurkar were made without giving him an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the State's petition and allowed Antapurkar's petition, expunging the adverse remarks. The court directed that the adverse observations against Antapurkar be deleted from the Tribunal's judgment.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Non-application of Mind - Transfer Policy - The Tribunal set aside the transfer order dated 20 November 2018 changing the posting of the applicant from Nagpur to Solapur, holding that the order was passed without application of mind and in violation of the transfer policy. The High Court upheld this finding, noting that the transfer was made without considering the applicant's representation and without following the policy. (Paras 2-10)

B) Service Law - Adverse Remarks - Natural Justice - Expungement - The Tribunal made adverse observations against Dhawal P. Antapurkar, Director, Steam Boilers, without giving him an opportunity of hearing. The High Court held that such remarks could not be sustained as they were made in violation of principles of natural justice. The adverse remarks were expunged and deleted. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the transfer order of Sanjay Dinkarrao Mankar and in making adverse observations against Dhawal P. Antapurkar without affording him an opportunity of hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition No. 6957 of 2019 filed by the State of Maharashtra is dismissed. Writ Petition No. 5599 of 2019 filed by Dhawal P. Antapurkar is allowed. The adverse observations made by the Tribunal against Antapurkar are expunged and deleted from the judgment.

Law Points

  • Transfer order
  • Non-application of mind
  • Violation of transfer policy
  • Adverse remarks without hearing
  • Natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 228

Writ Petition No. 6957 of 2019 and Writ Petition No. 5599 of 2019 with Interim Application No. 3733 of 2022

2023-01-30

S.V. Gangapurwala, Acting C.J., Sandeep V. Marne, J.

2023:BHC-AS:4055-DB

Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Assistant Government Pleader; Mr. Mohan Sudame i/by. Mr. Piyush Pande; Mr. Sanghraj Rupwate a/w. Mr. Shashikant M. Mane

State of Maharashtra (in WP-6957/2019); Dhawal P. Antapurkar (in WP-5599/2019)

Sanjay Dinkarrao Mankar and Dhawal P. Antapurkar (in WP-6957/2019); State of Maharashtra and Ors. (in WP-5599/2019)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service matter - challenge to transfer order and adverse remarks

Remedy Sought

State sought to uphold transfer order; Antapurkar sought expungement of adverse remarks

Filing Reason

Transfer order changed posting of Sanjay Mankar from Nagpur to Solapur; adverse remarks made against Antapurkar

Previous Decisions

Tribunal allowed Original Application No. 1038 of 2018, setting aside transfer order and restoring posting at Nagpur, with adverse remarks against Antapurkar

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the transfer order of Sanjay Dinkarrao Mankar? Whether the adverse observations made by the Tribunal against Dhawal P. Antapurkar without hearing him are sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that transfer order was valid and passed in public interest. Antapurkar argued that adverse remarks were made without giving him an opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer orders must be passed with application of mind and in accordance with transfer policy; adverse remarks cannot be made against a person without affording him an opportunity of hearing, as it violates principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has allowed the Original Application of Sanjay Dinkarrao Mankar, setting aside the order dated 20th November, 2018 and has directed to restore his posting at Nagpur as per earlier order dated 29th September, 2018. The adverse observations made by the Tribunal against Shri. Dhawal P. Antapurkar cannot be sustained as they were made without giving him an opportunity of hearing.

Procedural History

Original Application No. 1038 of 2018 filed by Sanjay Mankar before Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal challenging transfer order dated 20 November 2018. Tribunal allowed OA on 29 March 2019. State filed WP-6957/2019 and Antapurkar filed WP-5599/2019 challenging the same judgment. High Court heard both petitions together and delivered judgment on 30 January 2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 18,91,600 with 7.5% Interest Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Motorcyclist.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Order Restoring Posting of Joint Director-Boilers, Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Director. Transfer order set aside for non-application of mind and violation of transfer policy; adverse observations against Dir...