Search Results for "fixed assets"

1130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim Under Section 125 CrPC, Restoring Magistrate's Order of Rs. 3000 Per Month. Sessions Court's Reduction Set Aside as Unjustified Given Husband's Income and Assets.

The petitioner, Anita Dashrath Dolare, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, dated 09.04.2018, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will Allegedly Executed Under Undue Influence and Suspicious Circumstances. Will dated 21st August 1997 of Vivien Theresa Vaz held not proved due to lack of testamentary capacity and failure to dispel suspicion regarding execution.

The case concerns a probate petition filed by Mirzban Darabshaw Surti, claiming to be the sole executor of the last Will and Testament of Vivien There...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Suit Maintainable Despite Absence of Notice Under Section 164 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Reliefs Against Society Are Consequential, Not Adversarial

The plaintiff, Kumar Tarachand Laungani, filed a suit against his brother, Deepak Tarachand Laungani (defendant no.1), and Shikarpuri Co-operative Hou...