Search Results for "equitable principle"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "equitable principle"

1436 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1436 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Passes Interim Orders to Curb Illegal Mining in Odisha and Directs Central Empowered Committee to Identify Violating Lessees. Mining Operations Require Mandatory Clearances Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Non-Compliance Renders Operations Illegal and Subject to Immediate Intervention Under Article 32.

1 Aug 2026

Two writ petitions were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Common Cause and by Prafulla Samantra and Anr. against the Union of India and ot...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Central Empowered Committee to Identify Mining Leases Operating in Violation of Environmental and Forest Laws in Odisha. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Illegal Mining and Directs Preparation of List of Defaulting Lessees for Interim Relief Under Article 32.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed by Common Cause and Prafulla Samantra, alleging rampant illegal mining in the Keonj...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Suspension of Mining Operations and Investigation into Illegal Mining in Odisha. Lessees Operating Without Statutory Clearances Under Environment and Forest Laws Ordered to Stop Mining, and CEC to List Violators.

1 Aug 2026

These writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution brought to light a massive mining scandal in the Keonjhar, Sundergarh, and Mayurbhanj distri...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition of Auction Purchaser Against DRAT Order Setting Aside Sale Under RDDBFI Act. Petitioner Challenges Order Directing Refund of Bid Amount, Alleging Fraudulent Agreement to Defeat Auction Sale.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Smt. K. Padma, auction purchaser of a property in a bank recovery sale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

12 Jun 2015

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

High Court

KAHC010217682014_1

12 Jun 2015

...

High Court

High Court Quashes Accused in Second FIR Case Due to Impermissibility of Multiple FIRs for Same Incident. Second FIR for Offences Under Sections 504, 332, 353 IPC Arising from Same Occurrence of Unauthorised Buntings Removal Held Inadmissible, Following T.T. Antony Principle.

20 Sep 2021

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered at Hosakot...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Interface Between Section 43-D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Article 21 of Constitution of India, and Propriety of Smaller Benches Diluting Larger Bench Decision on Bail. The Appeal Arises from High Court Dismissal of Bail Under UAPA and NDPS Act, Raising Questions on Compatibility of Bail Restrictions with Right to Personal Liberty.

1 Jan 1970

The appellant, a government employee and political activist associated with the Jammu & Kashmir People's Conference, was initially taken into preventi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.

29 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

70 71 72 73 74

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)