Search Results for "annual compliance"

1012 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1012 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.5134 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree — Valid Service of Demand Notice and Application of Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act Upheld. Tenant's refusal of notice and monthly tenancy established; Appellate Court's findings not perverse.

The petitioners, Gorakh Rambhau Chothve and Jalinder Rambhau Chothve, were defendants in a suit for eviction and arrears of rent filed by the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...