NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018
2 May 2019...
Search Results for "Demand draft"
1220 result(s) found
Found 1220 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Expenditure Tax Reassessment Case Due to Non-Compliance with Natural Justice Principles. Reassessment Order Set Aside for Failure to Furnish Reasons and Dispose Objections as Mandated by GKN Driveshaft.
30 Aug 2019The appellant, Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd., filed a return under the Expenditure Tax Act, 1987 for assessment year 1997-98 showing nil chargeable ex...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Damages Against Shipowner and Agent Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Failure to Prove Negligence. The court held that the plaintiffs, as endorsees of bills of lading, could not sue the shipowner for short delivery without establishing negligence or breach of contract.
19 Aug 2005The plaintiffs, Union of India and Union Potash Ltd., filed a suit against Arimar Lines Ltd. (the shipowner) and Chowgule Brothers (the agent) for dam...
- 177
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of the complainant once the signature on the cheque is admitted, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt.
19 Jul 2013The appellant, Krishna P. Morajkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, which set aside the convict...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MOFA Act Dispute Over Carpet Area Representation — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Purchaser's Rights Pending Trial. The court held that the purchaser had made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoured grant of injunction to protect the subject matter of the suit under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.
11 Dec 2013The appellants, Mrs. Sarika Paresh Mehta and Mr. Paresh Ratilal Mehta, original plaintiffs, entered into an agreement with the respondent, ERA Realtor...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.
2 Mar 2006The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal and Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal in Demolition of Unauthorized Footpath Stall Case. Court holds that a person occupying public footpath without valid authorization is a trespasser and cannot claim protection of principles of natural justice before demolition.
21 Aug 2006The plaintiff, Vasant Marappa Shetty, was carrying on business in a wooden stall admeasuring 2.28 meters situated on the footpath of RTO Lane Naka, Lo...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Company That Ceased to Exist After Conversion into LLP — Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Issued to Non-Existent Entity. The court held that a notice under Section 148 issued to a company that had ceased to exist after conversion into an LLP is void ab initio and cannot be sustained.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy LLP, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, se...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Dismissal of Conductor Who Fell Unconscious During Duty. Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and 50% Back Wages Granted as Punishment Was Shockingly Disproportionate.
5 Mar 2014The petitioner, Arjun Shankar Wagh, joined the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) as a Conductor in 1977. On 4 May 1990, while on du...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Unfair Labour Practice - Upholds Payment of Wages for Lockout Period but Denies Reinstatement. The court held that an illegal lockout entitles workmen to wages, but reinstatement cannot be granted in a closed mill under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
26 Jun 2014The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 14 February 2003. The Sarva Shramik Sangh, a trad...
- 75
