Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Company That Ceased to Exist After Conversion into LLP — Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Issued to Non-Existent Entity. The court held that a notice under Section 148 issued to a company that had ceased to exist after conversion into an LLP is void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 92
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy LLP, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reassess the income of the erstwhile company, Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy Private Limited, for Assessment Year 2017-18. The erstwhile company had ceased to exist with effect from 17 March 2016 after its conversion into the petitioner LLP. The court found that the notice was issued to a non-existent entity and was therefore void ab initio. The court quashed the notice and all consequential proceedings, including the draft assessment order dated 29th March 2022. The court held that the reassessment proceedings must be initiated against the correct entity and that the successor LLP cannot be treated as the same entity without proper substitution. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment Notice - Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of Notice to Non-Existent Entity - The petitioner challenged a notice under Section 148 issued to a company that had ceased to exist after conversion into an LLP. The court held that the notice was issued to a non-existent entity and was therefore void ab initio. The court quashed the notice and all consequential proceedings, including the draft assessment order. (Paras 1-10)

B) Income Tax - Successor Liability - Conversion of Company into LLP - The court considered whether the successor LLP could be treated as the same entity for reassessment. It held that without proper substitution or amendment, the notice issued to the erstwhile company cannot be validated. The court emphasized that the reassessment proceedings must be initiated against the correct entity. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued to a company that had ceased to exist after its conversion into a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is valid and can be sustained.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice dated 30 March 2021 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and all consequential proceedings, including the draft assessment order dated 29th March 2022. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 issued to a company that has ceased to exist after conversion into LLP is invalid
  • Notice issued to non-existent entity is void ab initio
  • Successor LLP cannot be treated as same entity for reassessment without proper substitution
  • Limitation period for reassessment runs from date of notice to correct entity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 397

WRIT PETITION NO.2033 OF 2022

2025-11-03

B. P. Colabawalla, Amit S. Jamsandekar

2025:BHC-OS:20406-DB

Mr. P. J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nitesh Joshi i/b. Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocates for the Petitioner; Mr. Abhishek R. Mishra, Advocate for the Respondents/Revenue

Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy LLP (as successor in interest of Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy Private Limited)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(1)(1), Mumbai; Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 2(1), Mumbai; National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued to a company that had ceased to exist after conversion into an LLP.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the notice dated 30 March 2021 under Section 148 and all consequential proceedings.

Filing Reason

The notice was issued to a company that had ceased to exist, making it invalid.

Issues

Whether a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued to a company that had ceased to exist after its conversion into an LLP is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the notice was issued to a non-existent entity and is therefore void ab initio. The respondents argued that the notice was valid as the successor LLP could be treated as the same entity.

Ratio Decidendi

A notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued to a company that has ceased to exist after conversion into an LLP is void ab initio and cannot be sustained. The reassessment proceedings must be initiated against the correct entity.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Petition challenges the notice dated 30th March 2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This notice was issued to a company called 'Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy Private Limited' which ceased to exist with effect from 17th March 2016 after its conversion into the Petitioner LLP. The impugned notice issued under section 148 seeks to reassess the income of the erstwhile company for A. Y. 2017-18.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30 March 2021 and the draft assessment order dated 29 March 2022. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 3 November 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging CAT Direction for Expert Committee in Promotion Exam Dispute. CAT's Order to Consider Proportionate Marks for Defective Questions Does Not Amount to Revaluation and Is Within Jurisdiction.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Gambling Case Due to Lack of Essential Ingredients of Offence Under Section 12(a) of Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. FIR Alleging Betting on Cricket Matches with Mobile Phones and Money Did Not Disclose ...