Search Results for "tribunal fact finding"

5634 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5634 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Income Proof. Claimant's 100% Permanent Disability Acknowledged but Multiplier and Income Assessment Modified Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against the judgment and order dated 7.6.2004 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pune, in Claim Peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimants in Motor Accident Case, Upholds Negligence Finding Against Insurer. Compensation for father and son enhanced based on medical expenses, loss of earning capacity, and future medical expenses under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on June 30, 2018, at about 21:30 hours, when a father and son duo were riding their TVS XL Motorcy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Freight Refund Case. Refund of Rs.25,197 with interest upheld as Railways wrongly applied minimum rate condition for train load under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The Union of India appealed against the judgment and order dated 28th June 1993 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay Bench, which directed the Railw...