Search Results for "tenant's ownership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "tenant's ownership"

750 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 750 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement and Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 90 Days. The court upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing to condone the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the written statement, holding that the statutory period under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC cannot be extended beyond 90 days except in exceptional circumstances.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Vesta Building Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Building Declared Dangerous and in Ruinous Condition. Court Held That Occupants Cannot Resist Demolition of Unsafe Building on Grounds of Pending Redevelopment or Ownership Claims.

22 Aug 2019

The petitioners, three occupants of a building called New Kisant Cooperative Housing Society in Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged a notice dated 3rd July 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of MMC Act and DCR 33(7) — Held that Municipal Corporation must follow statutory procedure before demolition of dilapidated buildings.

19 Aug 2019

The petitioners, tenants residing in a cessed building known as Martand Prasad Building in Malad (West), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Caste Validity Suit — Limitation Period Under Article 58 Not Applicable as Suit Sought Consequential Relief. Suit for Declaration and Setting Aside of Scrutiny Committee Order Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, and Filed Within Time.

8 Apr 2019

The appellant, Gulab Ayubkhan Pathan, filed a suit (Special Civil Suit No.5 of 2017) before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application to Sell Matrimonial Home and Directs Husband to Pay EMIs in Family Court Dispute. The court held that the husband is liable to pay EMIs as maintenance and the wife may sell the property with court supervision to protect the matrimonial home from bank action under the Securitisation Act.

20 Mar 2013

The writ petition arose from an order of the Family Court No.7, Mumbai dated 23rd August 2011, which rejected the wife's application for direction to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Guardian for Elderly Litigant in Property Dispute — No Evidence of Mental Incapacity Found. Court Holds That Advanced Age Alone Does Not Justify Appointment of Next Friend Under Order XXXII Rule 15 CPC.

25 Jun 2012

The dispute arose between siblings over a flat in Matru Chhaya, Marine Drive, Mumbai, inherited from their father. The respondent No.1, aged 75, was t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

21 Oct 2011

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Satara, which c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Government's Direction on Non-Occupancy Charges Under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Court Held That Directions Issued Under Section 79A Are Binding on Cooperative Housing Societies and Cannot Be Challenged as Prejudicial to Society's Interest.

5 Oct 2011

The petitioners, Matru Ashish Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and its member Shashikant R. Doshi, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 1s...

69 70 71 72 73

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)