KAHC010422252008_1
17 Dec 2014...
Search Results for "single point tax"
1536 result(s) found
Found 1536 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.
17 Dec 2014On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Penalty and Appeals in Family Murders Case. Charges under Section 302 IPC for Killing Wife and Three Children Based on Circumstantial Evidence.
26 Jun 2006The Confirmation Case No.3 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.518 of 2005 arose out of the conviction of the accused Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral by the A...
- 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.
12 May 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...
- 385
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes DGFT Order Cancelling Advance Authorisation and EPCG Licences for Optical Fibre Manufacturer — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's licences restored as cancellation was based on irrelevant considerations and without proper hearing.
20 Jan 2022The petitioner, Ashwini Ashish Dighe, proprietor of Sunteck Telecommunications, a manufacturer of optical fibres, filed a writ petition challenging th...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.
23 Dec 2016The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...
- 172
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Oct 2019The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...
- 237
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes Rejection of Tender Bid for Arbitrary Application of Experience Criterion. The Court held that the tender evaluation committee's interpretation of 'experience of handling and transportation of food grains' was unreasonable and that the petitioner's experience in handling similar commodities should have been considered.
7 Apr 2017The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Freight Carriers, a proprietary concern, challenged a communication dated 09.09.2006 issued by the Central Warehousing Corp...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Leave to File Appeal Against Judgment in Commercial Suit Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Unexplained Delay. The court held that the appellant, not being a party to the suit, had no right to challenge the judgment and that the delay of 120 days was not satisfactorily explained.
6 Sep 2018The judgment concerns an application for leave to appeal and condonation of delay filed by Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. (ACIL) against a judgment ...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal in Eviction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of License and Unauthorized Occupation. The Court held that the appellants failed to prove Mundkar status and that the suit was not barred by the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.
6 Mar 2013The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants (defendants in the original suit) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of ...
- 111
