(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4168 OF 2012
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "service continuation"
1960 result(s) found
Found 1960 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Want of Prosecution Due to Non-Service of Defendants — Court Holds That Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC Requires Willful Default or Negligence, Not Mere Failure to Serve. The court restored the suit, emphasizing that the plaintiffs had made efforts to serve the defendants and had filed a Chamber Summons for substituted service, which was pending.
29 Jan 2018The appellants, M/s. Jain Developers and others, filed Suit No. 2808 of 2008 in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that there was a valid and...
- 74
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.
27 Jul 2023Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...
- 41
High Court
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction on Eve of Retirement — Belated Claim Rejected as Service Record Entry Cannot Be Challenged After Decades. Service Law - Date of Birth Correction - Belated Claim - Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, Rule 14 - The petitioner sought correction of her date of birth from 07.04.1960 to 19.03.1961 just before retirement after 35 years of service. The court held that such belated claims cannot be entertained as they would unsettle settled matters and affect the service of others.
4 Dec 2019The petitioner, Sau. Aruna Madhavrao Wankhede, was an Assistant Teacher and later Kendra Pramukh in Zilla Parishad schools. She joined service on 19.0...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Former State Chief Information Commissioner Seeking Pension and Retiral Benefits. Section 16(5) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 does not extend pensionary benefits to State Chief Information Commissioners as the phrase 'other terms and conditions of service' is limited to salary and allowances during tenure.
1 Aug 2024The petitioner, Shri Prashant S. P. Tendolkar, a retired State Chief Information Commissioner (SCIC) of Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...
- 368
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Service Disputes — Cooperative Society's Petitions Fail on Merits. Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India against awards of Labour Court, Ahmednagar, in Reference (IDA) No. 3/2014, 4/2014, 5/2014, and 6/2014, dismissed for lack of merit.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Akole Taluka Shikshak Va Shikshakettar Karmachari Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat Sanstha Mydt., Akole, a cooperative society, filed f...
- 138
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Short Service Commission Women Officers in Permanent Commission Denial Case Under Human Resource Policy 01/2019. The Court upheld the denial based on failure to meet Minimum Performance Criteria including average Appraisal Report grading and Mandatory Qualities, applied uniformly without gender discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
24 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a batch of appeals filed by six Short Service Commission Women Officers in the Indian Air Force, who were denied Permanent Comm...
- 476
High Court
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.
19 Sep 2006This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.
1 Jan 2023The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...
- 187
