Search Results for "possession delay"

3762 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3762 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs Magistrate to Expeditiously Dispose Section 14 SARFAESI Application for Possession of Secured Asset. Financial Institution's Right to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Upheld; Magistrate Directed to Pass Orders Within Two Weeks.

The petitioner, L & T Housing Finance Ltd., a financial institution registered under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, and as a Securitization and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Grant Under PTCL Act Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Petitioner's Mother Acquired Land in 1967, But Proceedings Initiated in 2011 Without Notice to Petitioner.

The petitioner, Sri R. Suresh Mohan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 09.10.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Will and Adverse Possession. The court held that the document dated 24.10.1960 was a Will and not a settlement deed, and that the appellant failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 30....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Probate — Secondary Evidence of Will Held Admissible Despite Non-Production of Original. Attestation Proved Through Scribe's Son and Attesting Witness's Daughter; Delay and Exclusion of Heirs Not Suspicious.

The present appeal was filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the original Opponents against the judgment d...