Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1329 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1329 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Second Appeal: Principles of Pleading in Will Disputes. Lower Appellate Court's Finding on Suspicious Circumstances Without Pleadings Held Impermissible.

17 Apr 2026

The second appeal arose from a partition suit where the plaintiff claimed 4/5th share in the suit property based on a Will (Ex.A2) executed by Kamalat...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Found Genuine and Binding on Defendants. Court upholds concurrent findings of fact that the sale deed executed by husband of first defendant for family necessity was valid and that plaintiffs had established title and possession.

8 Jan 2025

The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff Varadappan (since deceased, represented by respondents 2 to 8) filed a suit for decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Limitation. The court held that the trial court and first appellate court erred in dismissing the suit for possession based on title without properly considering the plea of adverse possession and the applicability of Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, whi...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Oral Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellant failed to prove the alleged oral partition and adverse possession, and the concurrent findings of the lower courts were not perverse.

27 Jan 2025

The respondent/plaintiff, Ammakannu Ammal, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of a 1/7th share in the suit properties, claiming that t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that a second appeal under Section 100 CPC is not maintainable against concurrent findings of fact unless substantial question of law arises.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Recovery Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff, who purchased property from co-owners, cannot recover possession without establishing his title and the defendants' possession as trespassers, and the concurrent findings of fact by lower courts cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

7 Jan 2025

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession and damages against the respondents/defendants 2 and 3 in respect of a property that w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in National Highway Acquisition Compensation Case — District Magistrate Cannot Review SLAO Award Under Section 3G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956. The power under Section 3G(5) is limited to correction of errors apparent on record and cannot be used to re-determine compensation or review the award on merits.

1 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a land acquisition proceeding under the National Highways Act, 1956 for widening National Highway No. 29 in District Mau, Uttar ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Dispossession Without Due Process of Law. The Court held that a suit for possession based on prior possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is maintainable even against the true owner if the plaintiff was in settled possession and was dispossessed otherwise than in due course of law.

26 Nov 2015

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Smita Prakash Chikhale and Sunita Dharnidhar Chikhale) against the ju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Agreement to Sell. Trial court's finding that no agreement was executed and no advance paid upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Admits Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit Where Possession Claimed Under Tenancy, Framing Substantial Question on Civil Court's Duty to Refer Tenancy Dispute to Land Tribunal. The appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 raises the issue whether Section 133 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 mandates reference to Land Tribunal when the claim for injunction is based on alleged tenancy rights.

7 Jan 2016

The dispute concerns agricultural land bearing Sy.No.46 measuring 1.84 acres at Muddapura Village, of which the plaintiff claimed possession as a tena...

69 70 71 72 73

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)