Search Results for "finance act 2021"

1169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Refund of Rs.56 Crore Service Tax Deposit Retained Without Authority of Law. Petitioner Bank's deposit made under protest to buy peace on interchange income cannot be retained without show cause notice or adjudication order.

The petitioner, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the retent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid When Based on Same Material Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Shivam Ispat Private Limited, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2016-2017 declaring total income of Rs.32,58,510/-. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Consider Reward to Informer's Widow Under Circular 20/2015 — Withholding of Reward Unjustified. The court held that the reward policy must be applied and the widow's representation must be considered within eight weeks.

The petitioner, Jayashree Chandrakant Dhavre, is the widow of a deceased informer who provided specific information to the Marine and Preventive Wing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Non-Compliance of DRP Directions Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Complete Assessment Within One Month of Receiving DRP Directions Renders Transfer Pricing Addition Time-Barred and Non-Est.

The Petitioner, Archroma International (India) Private Limited (formerly Huntsman International (India) Private Limited), filed a Writ Petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Stay on Co-operative Bank Recruitment — Chief Minister Lacks Statutory Power Under MCS Act to Interfere in Autonomous Bank's Internal Management.

The petitioners, Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its Chairman, challenged the order dated 29.11.2022 passed by the Chief Minist...