Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

942 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 942 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Single Judge's Order Partially Setting Aside Arbitral Award. The Court affirmed reduction of interest rate from 18% to 12% per annum and setting aside of claim nos. (d) and (g) and interest on security deposit.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) against a judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's finding of breach of contract and award of damages upheld as not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, through the General Manager of Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Withdraw Consent for Arbitrator Appointment in Arbitration Dispute — Consent Once Given Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose out of a Memorandum of Understanding dated 23 October 2006 and an additional Memorandum of Understanding dated 27 March 2008 between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting by Railways — Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasoned Order. The court set aside the blacklisting order for being arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Apar Industries Ltd., a major supplier of Over Head Equipment to the Indian Railways, challenged a blacklisting order passed by the Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award — Time Limit in Consent Order Held Directory, Not Mandatory. Arbitrator's Mandate Did Not Terminate Automatically Upon Expiry of Four-Month Period Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 31.3.2004. The dispute originated from Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Enforcement of Foreign Awards Due to Non-Compliance with Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Failure to Produce Original or Certified Copies of Arbitration Agreement and Award Renders Petitions Not Maintainable.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Armada (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. against Ashapura Minechem Ltd. seeking enforcement of foreign aw...