WRIT PETITION NOS. 4564, 4565
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "commercial tax officer"
1319 result(s) found
Found 1319 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).
31 Jan 2012The petitioner, Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Bombay Public Trust Act,...
- 83
High Court
High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.
23 Apr 2014The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cess Demand Against Small Scale Unit in MIDC Area for Lack of Jurisdiction. NMMC Cannot Levy Cess on Industrial Premises Outside Its Municipal Limits Under Section 127 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
8 Jul 2010The petitioners, M/s Sargam Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged the order dated 29th November 2007 passed by the Cess Officer of the Navi Mum...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.
14 Nov 2019The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...
- 591
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Borrowers' Right to Hearing in RBI Fraud Classification Directions. The Court held that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, must be read into the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 to prevent arbitrariness, as classification entails serious civil consequences under Clauses 8.9.4 and 8.9.5.
27 Mar 2023The civil appeals arose from challenges to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directio...
- 324
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Municipal Circular Revising Hoarding Advertising Licence Fees. Petition Questions Validity of 2009 Circular Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Sections 328A and 479.
27 Jan 2016The matter involved consolidated writ petitions filed by outdoor advertising firms and an association challenging licence fee revisions imposed by the...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Section 148 Notice Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.
10 Feb 2023The petitioner, Konark Life Spaces, a registered partnership firm, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30 March 20...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Cost of Repair/Reconstruction of Tenanted Premises Held Capital in Nature. The court held that the contribution of Rs.1.50 Crores by the tenant-assessee for repair/restoration of the building was capital expenditure, not allowable as revenue deduction under Section 30(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
30 Jan 2012The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of ...
- 28
High Court
Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.
31 Jan 2019The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...
- 108
