Search Results for "Section 20(4)"

1165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Order Quashing Process for Mischief Under Section 426 IPC. Construction on Own Property Not Mischief Unless It Causes Wrongful Loss or Damage to Complainant's Property.

The petitioner, Sayyad Yunus Pachulal Patel, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the learned Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dadaji Fakroji Kharkar, was an Assistant Grader at a Cotton Federation Centre. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Biloli, under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Duplicate Share Certificates Under Section 84(4) of Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Title Requires Civil Suit, Not Summary Company Application

The appellant, Rai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi & Bros. Pvt. Ltd., filed a company application under Section 84(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking duplic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Manikandan, was convicted by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal, for offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(j)(ii) of the Pro...